Skip to main content

Deep Dive

Deep Dive 11 Nov 2024 - 8 min read
AMI CPD: 1
Listen to the Podcast  

Some B2B firms are realising Byron Sharp was right on distinctive assets versus differentiation all along. A slew of recent research underlines that buying committees are increasingly buying on brand, not product features – and they've usually made up their minds before the first marketing qualified lead (MQL) lands with sales, rendering MQLs increasingly redundant. IT firm Logicalis ran the numbers on its own campaigns and found only 21 per cent of its potential customers were even aware of it – and that a single percentage point awareness gain would drive massive revenue growth. Moreover, six in ten of its potential customers couldn't recall a single ad from any of its competitors in the last 12 months – presenting a major opportunity to start optimising to awareness and driving conversion via bolder comms. "Funnily enough, I didn't find much resistance," says head of marketing, Lara Barnett. ABB global digital marketing and content chief Sophie Neate says the engineering giant has dropped MQLs as a KPI altogether and is now getting more joy out of other metrics while creating and personalising content across a much broader range of buying committee stakeholders. Stuart Jaffray, MD of B2B specialist agency Green Hat, urges brands to go all out on distinctive brand assets, brand awareness, mental availability and recall. Plus, forget the answers you wrote in your last ten RFPs and instead look at the questions – and develop content around them. Then the buyers will come to you.

Deep Dive 22 Oct 2024 - 8 min read
AMI CPD: 1
Listen to the Podcast  
Deep Dive 15 Oct 2024 - 12 min read
AMI CPD: 1
Listen to the Podcast  

Deep Dive Library

Deep Dive 28 May 2024 - 7 min read
AMI CPD: 1
Listen to the Podcast  

Another salvo in the fast approaching privacy regime set for tabling in parliament in August was fired last week by the ACCC around how personal information is collected, used and sold by data firms – Experian, Nielsen, Publicis-owned Epsilon and Woolworths-owned Quantium were among those flagged by the competition regulator last week in its eighth interim report as part of the multi-year Digital Platforms Inquiry. But the regulator has gone much further than putting these companies in the spotlight - it originally called them ‘data brokers’ but industry players in their submissions to the ACCC protested at the descriptor because they asserted they did not trade in personal information. Rather, they enabled companies who bought their services to segment and target audiences with shared attributes through the use of information that wasn’t personally identifying. So the ACCC changed the term to “data firms” in last week’s Data Products and Services interim report and, for good measure, broadened the scope of what a data firm is to what UNSW’s Business School’s Professor of Practice and Principal at Data Synergies, Peter Leonard, says now makes “every firm in this economy a data firm.” And in the short-term, that’s not good news for most companies because their data readiness and maturity is not matched by the “fundamental change” which will force everyone to “rethink their understanding of what even defines personal information” according to ADMA’s Director of Legal and Advocacy, Sarla Fernando. Leonard and Fernando are joined by Capital Brief’s Legal and Regulatory Affairs Correspondent, Laurel Henning and Civic Data’s founder, Chris Brinkworth. And for a tantalising teaser, Future Media’s Ricky Sutton lays out the changes Google is making to its search engine which is already seeing organic referral traffic to publishers abroad drop 40 per cent – brands, he says, are facing similar declines. Here's the topline takeouts from this week’s podcast panel of experts on the ACCC’s new intent for tougher definitions, enforcement and prosecution. Listen to the podcast here, it's rich pickings. 

 

Deep Dive 20 May 2024 - 9 min read
AMI CPD: 1
 
Deep Dive 13 May 2024 - 10 min read
AMI CPD: 1
Listen to the Podcast  
Deep Dive 6 May 2024 - 10 min read
AMI CPD: 1
Listen to the Podcast  

The stampede by companies into CX, with massive associated investments into martech, specialists teams and organisational overhauls, is having little impact on customer experience scores – and big banks, telcos, and car brands are at best benchmarked as average, despite investing billions collectively. CSBA Managing Director, Paul van Veenendaal, has seven years of CX performance data from 12,000 annual assessments across 200 Australian firms and it’s a sobering read for those firms heralding their commitment to connecting up and improving the experience across all customer contact points. In short, all that tech investment is simply not hooked up to customer contact centres – and NPS scores, which many leadership teams have linked to performance and bonuses, are “being gamed”, he warns, for better but hollow CX benchmarks. No big brands feature in the top 10 of CSBA’s CX rankings, and only one, a superannuation company, makes the top 20. Chatbots aren’t up to scratch yet, says van Veenendaal, and companies have “pretty much parked” speech analytics. Meanwhile despite heavy investment in digital transformation, call centre volumes have not declined over the last seven years – and those call centres are focused on the wrong outcomes and metrics, he says. Hence underwhelming CX scores across CSBA’s rankings. But some sectors are nailing it: Universities and colleges, water companies and local authorities – the latter at least partially due to the policies of a one-time adman and former Victorian Premier. Here’s where van Veenendaal thinks it’s all going wrong – and how to fix it.

Deep Dive 30 Apr 2024 - 10 min read
 
Deep Dive 30 Apr 2024 - 9 min read
AMI CPD: 1
Listen to the Podcast  
Deep Dive 23 Apr 2024 - 6 min read
Listen to the Podcast  
Deep Dive 16 Apr 2024 - 8 min read
Listen to the Podcast  

Five years ago media ecologist Jack Myers made a prediction in the second ever edition of Mi3: By 2025 media would be largely automated, almost totally AI-informed and just a quarter of sales would remain with people and ideas. It happened faster than even he thought. Now Myers predicts that within 12-18 months, most media planning will be entirely machine-led – and by 2030, “80 per cent or more of all media planning and buying will be done without human intervention”, with major implications for jobs. Meanwhile, AI is already being turned in on itself to spotlight where the money is being wasted amid a “programmatic backlash”. The “machines are actually checking on machines,” says Myers. He forecasts an incoming wave of consolidation across major media companies and a “collapse of the programmatic marketplace”. For agencies, “the re-emergence of consolidated agencies”, i.e. creative and media back together, “is the big story of 2025-26” with generative AI forcing the toothpaste back into the tube. “So I believe in 2024-25, we're going to see massive consolidation, massive contraction, and then in 2025, 26, 27 a rebirth of the advertising business.” But 2025, he warns, will be tough. Plus Myers – who likewise called out retail media’s impact early – sees a “can of worms” for the sector as analysts uncover instances of arbitrage of non-retail inventory within some retail media networks. He also has reservations on the surge by media owners into data clean rooms – Disney alone is operating 100-plus – “Who is cleaning the data? Who is validating that it is clean?”

Deep Dive 9 Apr 2024 -
 
Search Mi3 Articles