Skip to main content

Deep Dive

Deep Dive 11 Nov 2024 - 8 min read
AMI CPD: 1
Listen to the Podcast  

Some B2B firms are realising Byron Sharp was right on distinctive assets versus differentiation all along. A slew of recent research underlines that buying committees are increasingly buying on brand, not product features – and they've usually made up their minds before the first marketing qualified lead (MQL) lands with sales, rendering MQLs increasingly redundant. IT firm Logicalis ran the numbers on its own campaigns and found only 21 per cent of its potential customers were even aware of it – and that a single percentage point awareness gain would drive massive revenue growth. Moreover, six in ten of its potential customers couldn't recall a single ad from any of its competitors in the last 12 months – presenting a major opportunity to start optimising to awareness and driving conversion via bolder comms. "Funnily enough, I didn't find much resistance," says head of marketing, Lara Barnett. ABB global digital marketing and content chief Sophie Neate says the engineering giant has dropped MQLs as a KPI altogether and is now getting more joy out of other metrics while creating and personalising content across a much broader range of buying committee stakeholders. Stuart Jaffray, MD of B2B specialist agency Green Hat, urges brands to go all out on distinctive brand assets, brand awareness, mental availability and recall. Plus, forget the answers you wrote in your last ten RFPs and instead look at the questions – and develop content around them. Then the buyers will come to you.

Deep Dive 22 Oct 2024 - 8 min read
AMI CPD: 1
Listen to the Podcast  
Deep Dive 15 Oct 2024 - 12 min read
AMI CPD: 1
Listen to the Podcast  

Deep Dive Library

Deep Dive 7 Aug 2023 - 10 min read
Listen to the Podcast  
Deep Dive 31 Jul 2023 - 6 min read
Listen to the Podcast  
Deep Dive 24 Jul 2023 - 16 min read
Listen to the Podcast  

Tightening privacy regimes around the world are forcing Google to change the way it tracks and measures traffic across most of the 100 million websites globally that use analytics software to make sense of their user behaviour and purchases. Google’s near-ubiquitous Universal Analytics product was officially meant to switch off to website owners around the world on July 1 – bar those large enterprise and corporate customers who pay for Google’s top end 360 software suite; they have another year. Three weeks on from its long-announced shutdown, Universal is still being used by website owners. Ultimately it will give way to a new and already troubled successor, known as GA4. The problem? For most GA4 is a mess and a likely marker for what might hit Australian businesses. European and even US companies are exiting Google's analytics platform as ecom and marketing teams fumble with new tools, unable to quickly pull key reports, historical comparisons or insights. To boot, many are realising they don't fully own their data while it's in the Google machine. Those issues along with concerns over GDPR compliance are sending risk departments into overdrive. In France, about 80 per cent of large firms have reviewed their analytics as a result, per Piano’s global analytics chief Marie Fenner, and “about 60 per cent” have "switched". That scenario may soon repeat in Australia as data privacy rules are beefed-up. A blue chip performance marketer Jason Elk, who's worked for Nine and Westfield parent Scentre Group, thinks the shake-up threatens Google’s analytics dominance and by proxy its broader business. Matomo CRO Dion Blair, agrees. “Right now, unlike any time in the past 15 years, we're seeing the choice [businesses are making for analytics] is potentially not the big behemoth.” He thinks Google "sampling" website owner audience data is also a major issue. Here’s what marketers locally and globally are likely to face. 

Deep Dive 17 Jul 2023 - 10 min read
Listen to the Podcast  

NAB CMO Suzana Ristevski is a touch emphatic after just completing a three-year, $45m grinding overhaul of the bank's marketing technology systems that has seen 95 per cent of the tools used by the marketing team switched out – a Pega decisioning engine and Tealium's customer data platform are among the new line-up. Now NAB is ready for the AI stuff.  Ristevski acknowledges “inflicting a lot of pain” on the bank’s marketing team in the tech transformation and there’s more to come but it's "more exciting" as NAB works to embed machine learning and generative AI to deliver personalisation at scale that isn’t just “sending out rubbish”. She’s already sent out 10x more comms, now circling at 500m. But the bank is acutely aware of the risks posed by AI – and the strategy goes all the way up to the top. Tabcorp is onto its third in-house generative AI program and the creation of a centralised unit, Next Labs, to experiment – the problem with the other two was that they lied, or suffered “hallucinations”, per Chief Data & Analytics Officer Amy Shi-Nash. But Tabcorp can’t risk plugging into things like ChatGPT. The Monkeys and Accenture Song ANZ boss Mark Green, meanwhile, is back from Cannes where the AI banter was redlining on a "moral crisis" crisis for creativity, not dissimilar to the previous metaverse hype cycle. Green’s not worried. He reckons he’s slipped Accenture Song Global Creative Chair Nick Law an idea “that’s as good as any we’ve ever created” with generative AI at its core – and he says the client briefs are coming in from all angles. New York-based Law thinks there are new AI risks which will undermine the fascination and effectiveness of personalisation – namely, tonnes of mediocre messaging that will be created under the guise of 'right person, right time', unleashing a sea of sameness. NAB's Ristevski agrees.

Deep Dive 3 Jul 2023 - 7 min read
Listen to the Podcast  
Deep Dive 25 Jun 2023 - 8 min read
Listen to the Podcast  
Deep Dive 22 Jun 2023 - 6 min read
 
Deep Dive 20 Jun 2023 - 6 min read
Listen to the Podcast  
Deep Dive 13 Jun 2023 - 8 min read
Listen to the Podcast  
Search Mi3 Articles